Research on APS Therapy
A variety of clinical studies in New Zealand, Canada and South
Africa show the significant positive effect of APS Therapy on the
sensation of pain and the mobility of the treated persons.
Research studies were done 751 patients with disorderssuch as osteoarthritis of the knee,
osteoporoses of the lower vertebra, neurosurgical pain, and chronic pain, different muscle
soreness's and slow healing wounds.
Research has shown that 73% of the patients with osteoporoses experience a positive effect
directly after the first treatment. After the second treatment is number has increased to even 83%.
The group of patients that experience no effect more than two treatments is only 13%. This shows
that APS Therapy has a positive effect on the patient in an early stage of the treatment.
New Zealand
Head of Project
Dr. P. James Watt, Auckland,
New Zealand
Study
32 patients treated for a wide
range of musculoskeletal pain
conditions, using the VAPS.
Results
78% reported a positive
response to the first treatment.
Of the 24 need patients that
received a follow-up treatment,
83% reported a positive
response.
Conclusion
"Generally the treatment was
used in conjunction with
mobilization of manipulation and
was a useful addendum. he
efficacy was generally similar to
acupuncture used in the same
situation but was easier to
administer and on occasions
had very successful relief of pain
"I found the device easy to use
and particularly useful in
reducing the initial discomfort
mobilization. This resulted in a
reduced need for pharmaceutical
prescription" Dr. Watt.
Head of Project
Dr. P. Botes, Auckland, New
Zealand
Study
38 patients treated for a wide
range of musco-skeletal pain
conditions and to determine the
impact of the APS device on
wound healing and mobility,
using the VAPS
Results
After the first treatments, the
average VAPS score fell 40%.
After the second treatments, the
average VAPS score fell 38%.
Both changes in VAPS scores
were significant, with p <
0.0001 for the corresponding
t-tests. 3 participants presented
with slow-healing wounds, all of
which reported accelerated rates
of healing (in addition to reduced
discomfort).
Conclusion
The efficiency was generally
good, especially for conditions
relating to the lumbar/sacroiliac
region. In addition to pain relief,
the device appeared to have a
noticeable effect on mobility.
Those who presented with
slow-healing wounds
experienced dramatically
accelerated rates of healing.
There was also a reduced
need for pharmaceutical
prescription" Dr. Botes.
South Africa
Head of Project
Prof. C.L. Odendaal (Head of
the Pain Control Unit; Dept. of
Anaesthesiology; Faculty of
Medicine; University of the Free
State).
Study
76 Patients with lower back
pain due to osteoporosis, were
selected.
Method
A Randomised, double-blinded,
placebo controlled study using
Visual Analogue Pain Scale.
Results
APS Therapy relieves pain to a
statistically highly significant
degree (p =0,0001 0,0033)
Conclusion
Prof. C.L. Odendaal: "Clinically
the effect of treatment was very
successful. APS treatment may
be an effective treatment for
chronic backache in the
osteoporotic patient.
Head of Project
Ms. P. Berger - Physio
(University of Witwatersrand), L.
Matzer Msc M (University of
Pretoria)
Study
Placebo controlled study on 99
patients with osteo arthritis
(OA) of the knee to investigate
the effectiveness of APS.
Method
A Randomised single blind
study. Visual Analogue Pain
Scale was used. Knee flexion
by goniometer.
Results
It was statistically proved that
APS Therapy is effective in a
treatment of patients with
osteoarthritis in the knee.
Conclusion
The increased improvement in
flexion in the APS group is
remarkable considering that the
treatment has ceased, yet
ongoing changes were
occurring. The increased
flexibility of the patients in the
APS group enables the patient
to participate more easily
in an exercise regimen and
assists in the improvement of
the quality of life of the osteo-
arthirits patient" Ms. P.Berger.
Published
The South African Journal of
Anaesthesiology and Analgesia,
June, 1999.
Head of Project
Dr. C. Marais, Saskatchewan,
Canada
Study
174 patients treated for 55
different ailments over a 3 month
period.
Results
From the 157 patients treated (17
did not return for follow-up
treatments), the following
observations were made:
• 72% improved or felt that APS
therapy was better than other
treatment modalities
• 28% did not improve or felt that
APS therapy was equal to other
modalities
• 50% had immediate relief of
pain
• 20% had immediate
improvement of swelling.
• 54% had immediate
improvement of stiffness.
• 50% had immediate
improvement of mobility.
• 23% had gradual improvement
of pain.
• 8% had a gradual improvement
of swelling.
• 15% had gradual improvement
of stiffness.
• 14% had gradual improvement
of mobility.
University of Pretoria
Head of Project
Prof. D.H. van Papendorp
(MBChB, PhD Med, Univ of
Stellenbosch)
Study
Assessment of Pain Relief on 285
patients with chronic pain.
Method
Visual Analogue Pain Scale
(VAPS) Mobility Index.
Results
The mean VAPS and MI improved
significantly in the patient group
as a whole.
Conclusion
Both on clinical grounds and by
patient self assessment, APS
Therapy appeared to be most
beneficial. This study has also
demonstrated significant clinical
efficacy of the APS Device" Prof
van Papendorp.
Published
The Medicine Journal,
January/February, 2000
Canada
South Africa